China AI Standardization White Paper (CESI, 2021 edition)
Issued by
China Electronics Standardization Institute (CESI), guided by the National AI Standardization General Group and the AI subcommittee of SAC/TC28
- September 30, 2026 · Correction — Corrected the issuer (CESI, not SAC with TC260), the editions (2018 and July 2021), and the link (fact-check finding). (Cody Maxwell)
- October 1, 2026 · Correction — Rewrote the practical steps, newsletter hook, search description, and audience fields to match the entry's corrected content. (Cody Maxwell)
Chinese standards authorities issued this non-binding policy document to map AI standards work. It identifies priorities and outlines planned national and international standardization efforts.
Applies To
Overview
The China Electronics Standardization Institute (CESI) compiles the China AI Standardization White Paper. The first edition came out in January 2018, and the latest, the 2021 edition, in July 2021. That edition was guided by the National AI Standardization General Group and the AI subcommittee of SAC/TC28. A separate AI Security Standardization White Paper came from TC260 in May 2023. The current national planning document is the 2024 guidelines for the AI industry standards system, issued by MIIT, the CAC, the NDRC, and SAC. The white paper serves multiple purposes: it maps the current landscape of AI-related national standards (GB standards, which are mandatory, and GB/T standards, which are recommended) in China, identifies gaps in the standardization framework, articulates priority areas for new standards development, and describes China's engagement with international standards bodies including ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, the primary international AI standards committee. The document covers standardization priorities across AI infrastructure, AI platforms, AI applications, and AI governance. Governance-related priorities include terminology harmonisation, data quality standards, AI testing and evaluation methodologies, security standards, and ethical AI standards. The white paper signals standards that are in development or planned, making it a valuable forward-looking intelligence source for enterprises that need to align product development and compliance documentation with anticipated Chinese national standards. While not legally binding, the standards referenced or foreshadowed in the white paper frequently underpin regulatory compliance requirements under China's AI-specific regulations and sector-specific rules issued by agencies such as the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), MIIT, and the People's Bank of China.
Key Requirements
- •No legally binding obligations; the white paper is a non-binding planning and signalling document
- •Enterprises are encouraged to engage with SAC and MIIT standardization processes to influence the development of forthcoming AI standards with commercial impact
- •AI systems deployed in China should be assessed for conformity with referenced GB and GB/T national standards, particularly where sector-specific regulations incorporate standards by reference
- •Terminology and classification definitions used in the white paper are likely to be adopted in forthcoming binding regulations and should inform internal taxonomy alignment
- •AI testing and evaluation standards foreshadowed in the white paper should be tracked as they may become mandatory conformity assessment references for regulated use cases
- •International standards equivalences identified in the white paper indicate areas where ISO/IEC or ITU-T compliance may satisfy Chinese requirements, reducing duplication for multinational enterprises
What Your Organization Must Do
- →Treat the 2021 white paper as a planning signal, not as a source of binding duties.
- →Map your China AI products against referenced GB mandatory and GB/T recommended national standards.
- →Track the 2024 AI industry standards system guidelines from MIIT, CAC, NDRC and SAC.
- →Align internal AI terminology and classification with the white paper's definitions before rules harden.
- →Join SAC and MIIT standardization processes to shape standards with commercial impact.
- →Check where ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 work overlaps Chinese standards to avoid duplicated conformity effort.
Playbook Guidance
Step-by-step implementation guidance for compliance teams.
