Federal Communications Commission AI Model Reporting and Disclosure Proceeding
Issued by
Federal Communications Commission
- September 30, 2026 · Correction — Added the timing set by EO 14365: Commerce due 11 March 2026, so the FCC's outer deadline was around 9 June 2026 (fact-check finding). (Cody Maxwell)
- October 1, 2026 · Correction — Rewrote the practical steps, newsletter hook, search description, and audience fields to match the entry's corrected content. (Cody Maxwell)
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is opening a proceeding on possible federal AI model reporting and disclosure standards. It follows the Commerce Department’s evaluation of state AI laws. An adopted standard could preempt conflicting state disclosure and reporting requirements.
Applies To
Overview
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proceeding is designed to assess the need for a uniform federal framework governing how AI models are reported and disclosed. Executive Order 14365 directs the FCC Chairman to start it within 90 days after Commerce publishes its identification of state AI laws. Commerce was due by 11 March 2026, which puts the outer deadline around 9 June 2026. The central question before the FCC is whether a federal standard is necessary to replace or supersede a fragmented patchwork of state-level AI reporting and disclosure obligations. The proceeding will likely involve public comment periods, industry submissions, and inter-agency coordination before any proposed rule is issued. If the FCC moves forward with a rulemaking, the resulting rule could override inconsistent state mandates under the Supremacy Clause (the constitutional rule that federal law prevails). The scope of any eventual standard, including which AI model types and deployers fall within its reach, remains to be defined through the proceeding. Enterprises subject to multiple state AI disclosure regimes should monitor this proceeding closely given its potential to unify or supplant existing compliance obligations.
Key Requirements
- •Proceeding to commence within 90 days of the Commerce Department's state law evaluation completion
- •FCC to assess whether a federal AI model reporting and disclosure standard is warranted
- •Potential adoption of uniform federal disclosure obligations for AI models, superseding conflicting state laws
- •Public notice and comment process expected prior to any proposed rule
- •Specific thresholds, timelines, and penalties remain to be determined through the rulemaking process
- •Enterprises operating under state AI disclosure laws should track preemption determinations as the proceeding develops
What Your Organization Must Do
- →Track the FCC docket for the opening of this proceeding, expected around 9 June 2026.
- →Inventory current state AI disclosure and reporting obligations so preemption impact can be assessed quickly.
- →Watch for the Commerce Department's identification of state AI laws, which starts the 90 day clock.
- →Prepare comments for the expected public notice and comment period, alone or through industry coalitions.
- →Avoid costly long-term investment in state-specific disclosure systems a federal rule could supersede.
- →Continue meeting existing state AI disclosure duties, since no federal standard has been adopted.
Playbook Guidance
Step-by-step implementation guidance for compliance teams.
Frequently Asked Questions
- When does the FCC AI model reporting and disclosure proceeding officially begin?
- EO 14365 gives the FCC 90 days after Commerce publishes its state-law identification, due by 11 March 2026. That puts the outer deadline around 9 June 2026. Commerce had not publicly released its evaluation as of spring 2026, so check the FCC docket.
- Could a final FCC rule preempt state AI disclosure laws like the Colorado AI Act or similar statutes?
- Yes, potentially. If the FCC adopts a federal standard, it could carry preemptive force under the Supremacy Clause, displacing conflicting state AI reporting and disclosure requirements. The actual scope of preemption will depend on the final rule's language and whether state laws directly conflict with it.
- What penalties could apply under the FCC AI model reporting and disclosure rule?
- No penalties have been established yet. Specific thresholds, timelines, and enforcement mechanisms remain to be defined through the rulemaking process. Organizations should monitor the public comment phase for proposed enforcement provisions.
- Which companies are likely to fall within the scope of the FCC AI model reporting proceeding?
- The proceeding is expected to affect AI developers and deployers of all sizes, including large enterprises and SMBs. However, the exact scope, including which AI model types and which deployers are covered, has not been defined and will be determined through the rulemaking.
- How can companies participate in the FCC AI model reporting and disclosure proceeding?
- Once the FCC formally opens the proceeding, a public notice and comment period is expected. Companies can file individual comments or coordinate with industry coalitions to submit joint submissions that reflect their AI model portfolios and current disclosure practices.
- Should organizations continue building out state-level AI disclosure compliance programs while this FCC proceeding is pending?
- Organizations should avoid making costly long-term investments in state-specific disclosure infrastructure that a federal rule could supersede. Maintain current state compliance obligations, but inventory them now so you can quickly assess preemption impact once the FCC defines the rule's scope.
